In the Gulf of California, living on intertidal sponges is a species of isopod Paracerceis sculpta, which
displays another type of male polymorphism. Males have ,again, three morphs body types
that each has variation in reproductive successes depending on what other type
of males are present. Living on or in the sponge, three male morphs maybe present:
ϒ β α The tree male morph types |
Large
α males that defend harems, smaller β males that mimic females in appearance
and behaviour, and minuscule ϒ males that hide themselves within the sponge
with large harems. To understand how male-male-male interactions functions,
researches observed and alter male densities and recorded their relative
reproductive success. The reproductive capability of each male morph was found to
be equal, if isolated with females. However, depending on what male morphs, as
well as the number of females, were present the reproductive success
changed. The researches devised a set of
rules for matting success (Table 1).
The
researchers, after two years of testing and observation, using genetic marks to
trace paternity, found these rules to be effective way to explain the
interaction.
Reference
Shuster, S & Wade, M 1991, 'Equal mating success among males reproductive strategies in marine isopod', Nature, vol 350, pp.608-610.
Interesting. What are the densities of males like in natural populations? Are there cases where only one type of morph occurs or do all morphs always occur together? Did Shuster & Wade (1991) give an indication of why males developed into different morph (e.g. was it based on body size at time of maturity)? Nice post.
ReplyDeleteNatural populations vary from sponge to sponge, there maybe one with just alpha, and some with two or all three. The reason for the the morph is genetic, each morph is code for gamma is a dominate type to alpha and beta, and beta is to gamma. from genetic sampling the found the the population is in Hardy Weinberg equilibrium
Delete