Male
features are thought to be influence by two selection factors: male-male
interaction, where males are in contest with each other, favouring traits for
excluding other males; and female-male interactions, where females select
males, favouring traits that females find attractive. In male-male interaction,
a male fends off other males in two ways by actual threat or by potential
threat – display of dominance. Although,
actual threats may be less important in our modern society with law preventing
them, they would have been in an evolutionary context a key factor. A perceived
threat, on the other hand, may still affect mate success, as it would exclude
other males. Being able to exclude other males would give a greater chance of
mate success. And so, being/showing dominance by your outward appearance, from
a male-male perspective, can be advantageous.
Studies have shown that there is a relationship between masculine vocal and
facial features, and dominance. If then dominance led to better success, natural
selection would act on these two traits. There was found to be a correlation
between males having a lower more masculine voice and the perception of
dominance by other males. In a study, it was shown that men would alter the
pitch of their voice in accordance with their perceived dominance. It was seen
that, a man would lower his pitch when talking to a male he thinks to be weaker
than himself, and raise the pitch if he thinks he is weaker.
By a similar token, men with stronger
jaw line are perceived as being more masculine and more dominant. A stronger
jaw line is thought be dominant in both appearance and practicality. Unlike voice,
having a strong jaw would help in an actual fight; strong jaws are less likely
to be broken. It is also thought that, facial hair may have evolved to increase
the apparent size of the jaw. This could explain why some studies had found
that: a male’s face with a beard was rated more dominate than clean-shaven one.
Therefore, it can be seen that male-male interactions are controlled by the traits
that intimidate/exclude competitors by a show of dominance.
to be continued
References
Puts, D.A., Jones, B.C. & DeBruine, L.M. 2012, "Sexual selection on human faces and voices", Journal of sex research, vol. 49, no. 2-3, pp. 227.
C.L Apicella, D.R Feinberg & F.W Marlowe 2007, "Voice pitch predicts reproductive success in male hunter-gatherers", Biology Letters, vol. 3, no. 6, pp. 682-684.
Boothroyd, L.G., Cross, C.P., Gray, A.W., Coombes, C. & Gregson-Curtis, K. 2011, "Perceiving the facial correlates of sociosexuality: Further evidence", Personality and Individual Differences, vol. 50, no. 3, pp. 422-425.
C.L Apicella, D.R Feinberg & F.W Marlowe 2007, "Voice pitch predicts reproductive success in male hunter-gatherers", Biology Letters, vol. 3, no. 6, pp. 682-684.
Boothroyd, L.G., Cross, C.P., Gray, A.W., Coombes, C. & Gregson-Curtis, K. 2011, "Perceiving the facial correlates of sociosexuality: Further evidence", Personality and Individual Differences, vol. 50, no. 3, pp. 422-425.
Very interesting. It’s good to see that humans are not “above” the laws of evolution. It’s also great to see the focus on interspecific sexual selection, as there does tend to be a bias on female mate choice driving male trait evolution. Could the perceived age of the male also be a factor here? I’ve heard it said that beards make men look older, and since age may play a role in dominance, could it be that a man with a beard is perceived to be older, and, as a result, more dominant? Cool information.
ReplyDelete